skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration


In September the music industry decided to take aim at the world’s biggest stream-ripping service,


  • Ovum asked Luke Hill, intellectual property lawyer at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, to examine some of the legal implications of stream ripping in light of the case.

Features and Benefits

  • Explains the legal implications of stream ripping.
  • Sets out the different copyright claims made by the music industry against the stream-ripping service.

Key questions answered

  • What claims has the recorded music industry made against
  • What are the implications of a win for either side?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • What is the case against all about?
  • Not so cut and dried
  • What can do now?

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team: +44 7771 980316

Asia-Pacific team: +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team: +1 212-652-5335

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now