skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Introduction

In September the music industry decided to take aim at the world’s biggest stream-ripping service, youtube-mp3.org.

Highlights

  • Ovum asked Luke Hill, intellectual property lawyer at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, to examine some of the legal implications of stream ripping in light of the youtube-mp3.org case.

Features and Benefits

  • Explains the legal implications of stream ripping.
  • Sets out the different copyright claims made by the music industry against the stream-ripping service.

Key questions answered

  • What claims has the recorded music industry made against youtube-mp3.org?
  • What are the implications of a win for either side?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • What is the case against youtube-mp3.org all about?
  • Not so cut and dried
  • What can youtube-mp3.org do now?

Recommended Articles

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at ClientServices@ovum.com

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now