skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Ovum view

Summary

On April 13, 2016, the Article 29 Working Party issued a statement detailing its opinion on the upcoming Privacy Shield agreement, the deal that will ensure that the transfer of personal data from EU countries to the US will be able to continue. The statement criticizes the agreement on several points, despite the acknowledgment that the Privacy Shield agreement is a significant improvement compared to the demised Safe Harbor. The European Commission (EC) is not obliged to take on board the comments of the Article 29 Working Group; however, it is now unlikely that the deal will go through without further amendments.

Back to the drawing board for the Privacy Shield agreement

The Article 29 Working Party (the body that groups together the Data Protection Authorities of EU countries) has sent the EC back to the drawing board on the Privacy Shield agreement. Tech companies have eagerly awaited this agreement since the demise of Safe Harbor.

Since the EC announced the key points of its deal with the US authorities, concerns have emerged about certain aspects, such as the many exceptions under which the bulk use of personal data could still be possible for US authorities. There are also concerns that the powers and independence of the ombudsperson, which should ensure that EU citizens have the ability to seek redress in cases of privacy breaches, are not clearly defined and guaranteed.

The opinion of the Article 29 Working Party is not binding for the EC; however, it is unlikely that the EC will be able to ignore it. It represents the position of Data Protection Authorities of influential member states. Also, the EC should be worried about building a framework that is not too easily subjected to legal challenge. If the European Court of Justice finds that the flaws of Safe Harbor have not been addressed in the Privacy Shield agreement, it will not hesitate to strike the latter down too. Companies affected by this agreement should prepare to face more uncertainty, because the deal is likely to undergo further amendments before it is finalized.

Appendix

Further reading

Data Protection Tracker: 4Q15, TE0007-000955 (December 2015)

"The EU–US Privacy Shield agreement will not address surveillance concerns," TE0007-000999 (March 2016)

Author

Luca Schiavoni, Senior Analyst, Regulation

luca.schiavoni@ovum.com

Recommended Articles

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

+44 (0) 207 551 9047 - Operational from 09.00 - 17.00 UK time

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 7770704398 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now