skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Introduction

While it’s rational for the enterprise to be preoccupied with the unprecedented regulatory fines associated with GDPR, the quieter mechanisms for consumer litigation and class action may pose a greater existential threat to the enterprise over time.

Highlights

  • GDPR grants data subjects significant rights in pursuing legal action against businesses that are in violation of the regulation.
  • For the enterprise, ongoing litigation and the toll of class-action lawsuits has the potential for greater cost over time than any single regulatory fine.
  • The ability to build consumer trust, backed by rigorous technical compliance capabilities, will be an important defense against consumer litigation.

Features and Benefits

  • Identifies the key data subject rights with regard to pursuing legal action against data controllers and processors.
  • Evaluates the potential impact of "crowdsourced" consumer enforcement of the regulation via litigation.
  • Assesses the enterprise expenses associated with ongoing litigation, relative to a one-time regulatory fine.
  • Identifies the technical capabilities that will be required for retrieving data during data discovery and litigation.
  • Evaluates the role of brand reputation and consumer trust in an enterprise GDPR compliance strategy.

Key questions answered

  • What data subject rights enable legal action against the enterprise under GDPR?
  • Why is litigation and class action from consumers potentially more costly than any single regulatory fine?
  • What are the operational burdens of ongoing litigation?
  • Why is consumer trust a critical asset in pursuing GDPR compliance?
  • How can the enterprise gain consumer trust and insulate itself from consumer legal action?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • GDPR arms consumers with legal mechanisms for enforcement
  • Ongoing litigation has the potential for greater cost than fines
  • Brand reputation and consumer trust is an important defense

Appendix

  • Further reading
  • Author

Recommended Articles

  • Service Provider Markets, Consumer & Entertainment Services,...

    MWC 2018 Highlights

    By Ronan De Renesse 27 Feb 2018

    Over 20 of our senior Ovum analysts and consultants attended this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona at the end of February. In between meetings, briefings and presentations, our analyst team were blogging and tweeting about key developments, trends and rumors. Have a look through our daily MWC 2018 Highlights to find out what happened.

    Topics 5G AI IoT Cloud Payments SDN/NFV Smart home

  • Internet of Things

    IoT Viewpoints 2018

    IoT Viewpoints explore the IoT opportunity in 2018 and beyond. Download our latest e-book to get our newest collection of thought leadership articles on the emerging IoT trends, technologies and opportunities.

    Topics IoT

  • Consumer & Entertainment Services

    US pay TV: Is it facing an existential threat?

    By Adam Thomas 28 Mar 2018

    With US pay TV having endured the worst year in its history, thoughts have inevitably turned to the future. The likelihood remains that the immediate future will remain highly uncomfortable for everyone except the scaled multinational digital platforms.

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at ClientServices@ovum.com

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now