skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Introduction

Major record company UMG has hit back in a case involving termination rights claims made by two musicians in the US. In February 2019, the musicians filed a class action lawsuit against UMG in a New York court claiming that the major label had refuted the artists' claims on the grounds that the sound recordings are works made for hire and so not available for termination under US copyright law.

Highlights

  • Major record company UMG has hit back in case involving termination rights claims made by two musicians in the US.

Features and Benefits

  • Details UMG's motion to dismiss claims made by two musicians in the termination rights case.
  • Explains the four reasons why UMG believes the claims by the two US musicians are without merit.

Key questions answered

  • What are termination rights as available as part of US copyright law?
  • Why does UMG believe the two musicians' claims do not comply with statutory and regulatory requirements?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • Wrestling back control of sound recordings in the US
  • Tiptoeing around the thorny issue of works made for hire
  • Satisfying the criteria to terminate

Appendix

  • Author

Recommended Articles

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team: +44 7771 980316


Asia-Pacific team: +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team: +1 212-652-5335

Email us at ClientServices@ovum.com

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now