skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration


European competition authorities have formally blocked Three’s attempt to take over O2, a move that was widely anticipated. This comes despite a number of concessions made by Three’s owners, Hutchison, designed specifically to address competition concerns.


  • Hostility from the national regulator (Ofcom) and competition authority (CMA) coupled with an unsympathetic EU Competition Commission always made this a tricky one to get through.

Features and Benefits

  • Learn why the Three/O2 merger was blocked by European competition authorities.
  • Learn why Ofcom wanted to preserve a four-player market.

Key questions answered

  • What concessions did the EU Competition Commission want?
  • What concessions have been offered elsewhere to get similar deals passed?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • The concessions the Commission wanted went beyond what anyone was prepared to offer
  • Ofcom fought tirelessly to preserve a four-player market and feared losing the "disruptive" operator
  • Maintaining the status quo is not an option for either Three or O2


  • Further reading
  • Author

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team: +44 7771 980316

Asia-Pacific team: +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team: +1 212-652-5335

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now