skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration


Music subscription service Spotify is facing a second class action lawsuit accusing it of reproducing and distributing sound recordings without the necessary license.


  • Some of the language used in both Lowery and Ferrick’s lawsuits would seem overly harsh to the casual digital music sector follower. In the last decade or so, terms such as “wholesale copyright infringement” and “irreparable harm” have been associated with pirate services that have generated no revenue at all for any rights holders.

Features and Benefits

  • The research note details the two copyright infringement lawsuits brought against Spotify in the US by two artists.
  • The research note assesses the merits of the lawsuits and the potential outcomes.

Key questions answered

  • Why have two artists in the US sued Spotify for copyright infringement?
  • What is the likelihood the cases will go to trial?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • Spotify and the class action copyright infringement claims
  • What Spotify should have done to avoid a legal claim
  • Intentions and irreparable harm


  • Author

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700

Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now