skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration


The the downward trend of mobile termination rates (MTRs) continues across all geographies; although this is hardly a surprise, it is striking that cost methodologies adopted to regulate MTRs are increasingly similar to one another.


  • Pure or BU-LRIC cost models are common in Europe, where regulators have to comply with the common framework set out in the EC’s Recommendation on Fixed and Mobile Termination Rates.

Features and Benefits

  • Provides an overview of global regulation of mobile termination rates in 2015.
  • Offers recommendations on how regulation of MTRs should evolve in the near future.

Key questions answered

  • How are MTRs regulated across geographies?
  • What should regulators do to regulate mobile termination in the future?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • LRIC cost models are increasingly popular across the world
  • Asymmetrical MTRs are now less common, but are not yet a thing of the past
  • SMS termination regulation remains, but the rise of alternatives could lead to changes


  • Further reading
  • Author

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700

Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now