skip to main content
Close Icon

In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way Informa uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.

Global Search Configuration

On July 26, 2016, Ofcom announced more detailed plans on how it intends to ensure a more independent Openreach. While the regulator has fallen short of calling for a full structural separation, which some of BT’s competitors would have liked, it does propose a model that is significantly different to the one that is in place today.

The industry has until October 4, 2016 to respond to Ofcom’s plan. Crucially, the regulator is still keen to hear alternative ideas for reform that would achieve the same outcome, if they come with lower costs and less disruption.

One such proposal has come from BT itself, the substance of which is fairly extraordinary if you think back to when Ofcom started this review just twelve months ago. The model BT is proposing is a separate entity in all but name and should go a long way to reassure some of BT’s competitors, which have found fault with the current arrangements. BT’s view is that its proposals provide Ofcom with every benefit it is seeking but without any of the substantial and unavoidable costs associated with legal incorporation.

In many ways, a voluntary agreement between Ofcom and Openreach, which is backed by the rest of the industry, would achieve more than years in court and a forced enhanced model of separation could. Many of the things proposed by Ofcom, and that are being offered by BT, could be enacted within months. Attention and money could then turn to getting on with delivering what this review is ultimately all about – making sure Britain has the broadband infrastructure fit for the next decade.

Nevertheless, for some, only full structural separation will be enough and it is important to note that Ofcom have kept this option on the table should its proposed model not deliver. Given the enormous costs and uncertainties, coupled with the weight of evidence, for Ofcom to proceed with structural separation now would be a disproportionate response, even if it could be practically delivered.

 

 

NOTES TO EDITOR:

For further details regarding this release or to speak to Matthew Howett, please contact Adam Clarke at the Ovum Press Office on +44 (0) 20 7017 4994 or email pr@ovum.com.

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

+44 (0) 207 551 9047 - Operational from 09.00 - 17.00 UK time

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 7770704398 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now