skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration


A California appeals court has ruled that plagiarism claims made by the estate of a little-known artist against Led Zeppelin and its record company and music publishers must be reheard.


  • The appeals court decided that the district court abused its discretion by not allowing the track Taurus to be played in court to prove the Led Zeppelin members had access.

Features and Benefits

  • Details the decision by a California appeal court that a plagiarism case brought by the estate of a deceased member of the band Spirit against members of Led Zeppelin and the band's record company and music publisher should be reheard.
  • Explains why the case is being returned to district court level and the grounds on which that decision was made.

Key questions answered

  • What elements in the 2016 district court decision does the appeals court believe were incorrect?
  • What has the district court been instructed to do that was omitted in the first hearing?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • Page, Plant, and Jones to reunite for California district court
  • Establishing copyright infringement
  • Three incorrect jury instructions


  • Author

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team: +44 7771 980316

Asia-Pacific team: +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team: +1 212-652-5335

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now