skip to main content
Close Icon

In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way Informa uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.

Global Search Configuration

Introduction

In September the music industry decided to take aim at the world’s biggest stream-ripping service, youtube-mp3.org.

Highlights

  • Ovum asked Luke Hill, intellectual property lawyer at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, to examine some of the legal implications of stream ripping in light of the youtube-mp3.org case.

Features and Benefits

  • Explains the legal implications of stream ripping.
  • Sets out the different copyright claims made by the music industry against the stream-ripping service.

Key questions answered

  • What claims has the recorded music industry made against youtube-mp3.org?
  • What are the implications of a win for either side?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • What is the case against youtube-mp3.org all about?
  • Not so cut and dried
  • What can youtube-mp3.org do now?

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

+44 (0) 207 551 9047 - Operational from 09.00 - 17.00 UK time

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 7770704398 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now