skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Ovum view

Summary

If the financial services industry's current fascination with distributed ledger technology (DLT) comes to naught, it will at least have nudged many institutions into accepting the benefits of collaboration to a far greater extent than in the past. Rather than multiple competing consortia, pan-industry groups have been formed, creating a viable ecosystem in which the use of the technology stands a greater chance of flourishing. But avoiding complexity will also be important.

Avoid complexity

Financial institutions have trumpeted their commitment to collaboration with their competitors for a long time, but in many cases this has largely been lip service: many of the "standard" processes and market practices, such as the FIX Protocol used in securities trading, owe their existence to the efforts of a few back-room stalwarts working in their own time.

At the end of last year, the R3 consortium announced that it had reached the membership limit of 42 banks laid down in its charter; that's 42 of the world's largest banks in a group that is now looking to extend membership to other types of institutions in the broader financial community, including non-banks. The creation of a network of this size is a prerequisite for successful adoption of DLT by incumbent market participants, but so too is making the deployment of applications as simple as possible – almost to the point of plug-and-play – if the promise of reduced friction in transactions is to be achieved.

The recent announcement that Earthport plans to develop an interface for its payment platform using the Ripple protocol, along with a similar deal between Ripple and CGI announced last October, suggests that progress is also being made on this front. Both companies describe the integration of the Ripple protocol to their systems in terms that suggest it will become just another interface, sitting alongside ports for SWIFT messages or whatever other connections are needed for whatever purpose – Earthport sees the primary use of the Ripple interface as a liquidity management tool, which should give those who think of it as just a connection some pause for thought.

The payment hub architecture, allowing connectivity to any and all potential payment types, overcame initial skepticism over the past decade as financial institutions realized that it would solve their Single Euro Payment Area compliance requirements. It may be too soon to say that a blockchain-based interface, such as that which Ripple is developing with its partners, will take its place as just another connectivity option in a payment hub, but it is certainly a desirable outcome.

Appendix

Further reading

"2016: Time to focus on what distributed ledgers can do for you," IT0059-000049 (January 2016)

Author

David Bannister, Principal Consultant, Financial Services Technology

david.bannister@ovum.com

Recommended Articles

  • Service Provider Markets, Consumer & Entertainment Services,...

    MWC 2018 Highlights

    By Ronan De Renesse 27 Feb 2018

    Over 20 of our senior Ovum analysts and consultants attended this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona at the end of February. In between meetings, briefings and presentations, our analyst team were blogging and tweeting about key developments, trends and rumors. Have a look through our daily MWC 2018 Highlights to find out what happened.

    Topics 5G AI IoT Cloud Payments SDN/NFV Smart home

  • Internet of Things

    IoT Viewpoints 2018

    IoT Viewpoints explore the IoT opportunity in 2018 and beyond. Download our latest e-book to get our newest collection of thought leadership articles on the emerging IoT trends, technologies and opportunities.

    Topics IoT

  • Consumer & Entertainment Services

    US pay TV: Is it facing an existential threat?

    By Adam Thomas 28 Mar 2018

    With US pay TV having endured the worst year in its history, thoughts have inevitably turned to the future. The likelihood remains that the immediate future will remain highly uncomfortable for everyone except the scaled multinational digital platforms.

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at ClientServices@ovum.com

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now