skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Ovum view

Summary

Despite the looming liability shift for EMV and payment card fraud in the US, more than half of SMEs are reportedly not ready for the switch and, more critically, are ambivalent about the benefits of the technology. In addition, concerns over contactless theft in Australia are likely to fall on deaf ears among issuers. Despite the protests of law enforcement and regulators alike, the economics of combating fraud are far more critical to driving change than the moral issue of ignoring criminal behavior. This approach risks slowing the development and implementation of proven fraud prevention technologies that ultimately benefit everyone.

It’s the economics, stupid

Recent reports in the Wall Street Journal suggest that nearly two-thirds of US SMEs are unprepared for the EMV fraud liability shift on October 1, 2015. Many seem to be simply unaware of the changes; others do not see the economic benefit of investing in upgrading their technology relative to the level of fraud they experience. The cost of upgrading remains high, particularly for smaller businesses with tight margins. In essence, this is a repeat of the broader US market’s long-term reluctance around EMV in microcosm: the cost of perceived fraud is outweighed by the cost of preventing it. As a result, the level of risk represented by using older technology remains acceptable to many.

On the other side of the world the Australian parliament and local law enforcement recently called on banks to voluntarily introduce an opt-in to contactless card functionality. This follows a reported rise in contactless card theft and usage, something authorities felt was worsened by the banks’ very public zero-liability policies for consumers on contactless transactions. However, the direct cost of this additional fraud is estimated at approximately $100,000 per year; this is far outweighed by the cost and complexity of introducing fraud-prevention capabilities.

Nobody likes fraud and few organizations will readily admit that they are willing to accept some level of risk simply as a cost of doing business. However, if initiatives to combat fraud are not mandated by regulators, the motivation for implementing them (or not) lies squarely within the realm of economics rather than justice. As such, vendors and payment providers globally need to be able to pinpoint clear cost benefits of investing in fraud technology, not only relating to card-based fraud, but across payment channels. This includes increasing our understanding of the wider costs of fraud, such as the cost of investigation and dispute resolution and the risk of losing the business of victims of fraud.

Appendix

Further reading

Tokenization in the Payments Value Chain, IT0059-000027 (September 2015)

Ensuring security is the key challenge in emerging payments, IT0059-000005 (April 2015)

Author

Gilles Ubaghs, Senior Analyst, Financial Services Technology

gilles.ubaghs@ovum.com

Recommended Articles

  • Service Provider Markets, Consumer & Entertainment Services,...

    MWC 2018 Highlights

    By Ronan De Renesse 27 Feb 2018

    Over 20 of our senior Ovum analysts and consultants attended this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona at the end of February. In between meetings, briefings and presentations, our analyst team were blogging and tweeting about key developments, trends and rumors. Have a look through our daily MWC 2018 Highlights to find out what happened.

    Topics 5G AI IoT Cloud Payments SDN/NFV Smart home

  • Internet of Things

    IoT Viewpoints 2018

    IoT Viewpoints explore the IoT opportunity in 2018 and beyond. Download our latest e-book to get our newest collection of thought leadership articles on the emerging IoT trends, technologies and opportunities.

    Topics IoT

  • Consumer & Entertainment Services

    US pay TV: Is it facing an existential threat?

    By Adam Thomas 28 Mar 2018

    With US pay TV having endured the worst year in its history, thoughts have inevitably turned to the future. The likelihood remains that the immediate future will remain highly uncomfortable for everyone except the scaled multinational digital platforms.

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at ClientServices@ovum.com

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now