skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Straight Talk IT


It is naive to think that the role of integration in Internet of Things (IoT) is largely confined to machine-to-machine (M2M) integration. Unless specific data collected by IoT devices is processed and analyzed to derive meaningful insights and/or develop innovative applications, it is difficult to attach any significant commercial connotation to enterprise IoT initiatives. The cost and complexity of integration continues to be a major roadblock to wider IoT adoption.

IoT integration is a complex and multifaceted issue

As per the Eclipse IoT Working Group's IoT Developer Survey 2015, "interoperability," "integration with hardware," and "M2M connectivity" are among the top-four concerns about the development of IoT solutions. Of the 356 respondents, 31% selected "interoperability" as the top concern, and this figure increased to 39% in the case of developers focusing on enterprise software. This is good evidence considering that respondents were experienced developers.

Moreover, as per the World Economic Forum Industrial Internet Survey 2014, "lack of interoperability or standards" is the greatest barrier inhibiting Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) adoption. The same survey indicated the "need to converge on standards to support better interoperability" as the second most important action item for hardware, software, and service providers in the IoT ecosystem.

IoT interoperability issues are compounded by an unrelenting tussle between interested parties, including IoT platform vendors, major software vendors, industry consortia, communications service providers, and device manufacturers, pushing the case for a specific M2M/IoT communications standard. Some industry pundits and devoted proponents have failed to see the big picture, and continue to add confusion to the ongoing debates. Although certain M2M/IoT communications standards have an edge over others in the first phase of adoption, Ovum advises IoT initiative leaders to refrain from any "religion" around specific standards.

IoT dramatically increases the number of integration points involved in the process of realizing a logical output from a complex ecosystem of connected things, users, and enterprise IT stack. The data collected at various endpoints of integration flows needs to be analyzed along with the "context" of usage to deliver actionable insights (e.g., real-time intelligence based on identified patterns/trends), and functionality based on interactions between connected devices and applications. This calls for elastic scalability to support processing of a large number of low-latency messages per unit time (potentially millions to billions of messages). In simpler terms, IoT involves high data velocity and event throughput, with acceptable latency measured in microseconds. A complex IoT solution stack can involve device-to-device, device-to-server, server-to-server, device-to-user, and server-to-backend communications, which require different communications standards, integration platforms, and infrastructure resources.

There is no standard IoT solution stack capable of supporting a wide range of IoT uses cases. Enterprises therefore continue to use a combination of traditional middleware and emerging M2M integration approaches for meeting the requirements of specific IoT use cases. Cloud-based infrastructure and platform services offer elastic scalability and can support high-throughput event processing, one of the key requirements for realizing value from IoT. Although both commercial and open-source middleware vendors are developing IoT offerings to fill the gap between M2M and enterprise integration, these are early days, and no vendor enjoys any significant competitive advantage.


Further reading

Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected Products and Services, World Economic Forum 2015. Available from [Accessed September 18, 2015]

IoT Working Group's IoT Developer Survey 2015, Eclipse IoT Working Group 2015. Available from [Accessed September 18, 2015]


Saurabh Sharma, Senior Analyst, Software – Infrastructure Solutions

Recommended Articles

  • Service Provider Markets, Consumer & Entertainment Services,...

    MWC 2018 Highlights

    By Ronan De Renesse 27 Feb 2018

    Over 20 of our senior Ovum analysts and consultants attended this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona at the end of February. In between meetings, briefings and presentations, our analyst team were blogging and tweeting about key developments, trends and rumors. Have a look through our daily MWC 2018 Highlights to find out what happened.

    Topics 5G AI IoT Cloud Payments SDN/NFV Smart home

  • Internet of Things

    IoT Viewpoints 2018

    IoT Viewpoints explore the IoT opportunity in 2018 and beyond. Download our latest e-book to get our newest collection of thought leadership articles on the emerging IoT trends, technologies and opportunities.

    Topics IoT

  • Consumer & Entertainment Services

    US pay TV: Is it facing an existential threat?

    By Adam Thomas 28 Mar 2018

    With US pay TV having endured the worst year in its history, thoughts have inevitably turned to the future. The likelihood remains that the immediate future will remain highly uncomfortable for everyone except the scaled multinational digital platforms.


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700

Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

+44 (0) 207 551 9047 - Operational from 09.00 - 17.00 UK time

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now