skip to main content
Close Icon

In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way Informa uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.

Global Search Configuration

Straight Talk IT

Summary

It is naive to think that the role of integration in Internet of Things (IoT) is largely confined to machine-to-machine (M2M) integration. Unless specific data collected by IoT devices is processed and analyzed to derive meaningful insights and/or develop innovative applications, it is difficult to attach any significant commercial connotation to enterprise IoT initiatives. The cost and complexity of integration continues to be a major roadblock to wider IoT adoption.

IoT integration is a complex and multifaceted issue

As per the Eclipse IoT Working Group's IoT Developer Survey 2015, "interoperability," "integration with hardware," and "M2M connectivity" are among the top-four concerns about the development of IoT solutions. Of the 356 respondents, 31% selected "interoperability" as the top concern, and this figure increased to 39% in the case of developers focusing on enterprise software. This is good evidence considering that respondents were experienced developers.

Moreover, as per the World Economic Forum Industrial Internet Survey 2014, "lack of interoperability or standards" is the greatest barrier inhibiting Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) adoption. The same survey indicated the "need to converge on standards to support better interoperability" as the second most important action item for hardware, software, and service providers in the IoT ecosystem.

IoT interoperability issues are compounded by an unrelenting tussle between interested parties, including IoT platform vendors, major software vendors, industry consortia, communications service providers, and device manufacturers, pushing the case for a specific M2M/IoT communications standard. Some industry pundits and devoted proponents have failed to see the big picture, and continue to add confusion to the ongoing debates. Although certain M2M/IoT communications standards have an edge over others in the first phase of adoption, Ovum advises IoT initiative leaders to refrain from any "religion" around specific standards.

IoT dramatically increases the number of integration points involved in the process of realizing a logical output from a complex ecosystem of connected things, users, and enterprise IT stack. The data collected at various endpoints of integration flows needs to be analyzed along with the "context" of usage to deliver actionable insights (e.g., real-time intelligence based on identified patterns/trends), and functionality based on interactions between connected devices and applications. This calls for elastic scalability to support processing of a large number of low-latency messages per unit time (potentially millions to billions of messages). In simpler terms, IoT involves high data velocity and event throughput, with acceptable latency measured in microseconds. A complex IoT solution stack can involve device-to-device, device-to-server, server-to-server, device-to-user, and server-to-backend communications, which require different communications standards, integration platforms, and infrastructure resources.

There is no standard IoT solution stack capable of supporting a wide range of IoT uses cases. Enterprises therefore continue to use a combination of traditional middleware and emerging M2M integration approaches for meeting the requirements of specific IoT use cases. Cloud-based infrastructure and platform services offer elastic scalability and can support high-throughput event processing, one of the key requirements for realizing value from IoT. Although both commercial and open-source middleware vendors are developing IoT offerings to fill the gap between M2M and enterprise integration, these are early days, and no vendor enjoys any significant competitive advantage.

Appendix

Further reading

Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected Products and Services, World Economic Forum 2015. Available from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_IndustrialInternet_Report2015.pdf [Accessed September 18, 2015]

IoT Working Group's IoT Developer Survey 2015, Eclipse IoT Working Group 2015. Available from http://www.slideshare.net/IanSkerrett/iot-developer-survey-2015 [Accessed September 18, 2015]

Author

Saurabh Sharma, Senior Analyst, Software – Infrastructure Solutions

saurabh.sharma@ovum.com

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

+44 (0) 207 551 9047 - Operational from 09.00 - 17.00 UK time

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 7770704398 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now