skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Straight Talk IT

Ovum view

Data, the subject everyone loves to love, has become a board-level agenda item, but organizations often make the mistake of focusing on the upside, without giving the same level of attention to potential downsides. In a recent report, Ovum claimed that "...if data has the power to reshape business positively, it also has the power to destroy it" – an assertion we stand by. As with the treatment of employees or supply chains, it is time to consider the ethics of what data is retained and how it is used. Defining "data ethics" is challenging, because there is no one-size-fits-all explanation – organizations will take many different views on the subject. To put it simply: If an organization wouldn't want the public to know about a particular data or analytical process, it needs to reexamine its ethical footing.

The ethical treatment of data is a matter of corporate governance

News outlets are increasingly interested in stories pertaining either to breaches in data security or privacy of data (of course, the two are often related). Whether it's the Snowden leaks or the failure of a high-profile corporate website, the result is the same: negative reaction. We believe the momentum behind these stories is only likely to continue – an ever-greater proportion of business is conducted in a potentially exposable fashion. This is not just a function of the cloud and has started to present a question often only asked by science fiction: "Just because we can, should we?"

The perfect storm of technology, analytical technique, and data availability has arisen to the point that a raft of questions about the availability of that data's analysis and, even, whether that analysis should be conducted have come to the fore. Many proponents will highlight the benefits of data analysis, yet are reticent on the subject of its potential drawbacks.

The other issue here is a matter of perception versus reality. Data professionals and the world at large have a very different understanding of technology and its limitations. The rise of cognitive technologies is a prime example. Recent protestations about the possible negative outcomes of a general artificial intelligence have the potential to become confused with real-world deployments of context-specific cognitive technology (IBM Watson, for example) and machine learning (the framework for machine learning in Spark, for example); both are careful applications of new technology, to either infuse contextual intelligence into decisions or automate existing process, respectively. The critical issue, however, stands. The general public doesn't necessarily have a good understanding of how the technology may be deployed today.

For the above reasons, and many more beyond, enterprises looking to benefit from the use of existing and new data sources / technology, and the vendors who enable that process, need to be cautious. Ovum stands by a core assertion: If data holds the potential to benefit many, it also has the potential to harm many (as an unexpected outcome, or purposefully negative). The logical reduction here is simple: Data and its potential benefits have become a board-level agenda item; therefore, equal attention must be paid to the conceivable downside. The corporate responsibility agenda just got bigger and the best practices for managing it are still developing. Ovum suggests that organizations take two steps in the near term:

  • First, establish clear lines of data responsibility – data governance isn't new but many of the processes and structures created to support and enforce it are often underused and poorly understood.
  • Second, apply a simple test to new data and analytics projects by asking the question, "How comfortable would the company be if this project appeared in the news headlines tomorrow?"

Appendix

Author

Tom Pringle, Practice Leader, Information Management

tom.pringle@ovum.com

Recommended Articles

  • Service Provider Markets, Consumer & Entertainment Services,...

    MWC 2018 Highlights

    By Ronan De Renesse 27 Feb 2018

    Over 20 of our senior Ovum analysts and consultants attended this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona at the end of February. In between meetings, briefings and presentations, our analyst team were blogging and tweeting about key developments, trends and rumors. Have a look through our daily MWC 2018 Highlights to find out what happened.

    Topics 5G AI IoT Cloud Payments SDN/NFV Smart home

  • Internet of Things

    IoT Viewpoints 2018

    IoT Viewpoints explore the IoT opportunity in 2018 and beyond. Download our latest e-book to get our newest collection of thought leadership articles on the emerging IoT trends, technologies and opportunities.

    Topics IoT

  • Consumer & Entertainment Services

    US pay TV: Is it facing an existential threat?

    By Adam Thomas 28 Mar 2018

    With US pay TV having endured the worst year in its history, thoughts have inevitably turned to the future. The likelihood remains that the immediate future will remain highly uncomfortable for everyone except the scaled multinational digital platforms.

;

Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700


Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at ClientServices@ovum.com

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at pr@ovum.com

Contact marketing - 
marketingdepartment@ovum.com

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now