skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

Ovum view


The Commission on Digital Democracy led by the Speaker of the House of Commons recommends that the UK adopt online voting by 2020. Recent developments have not made online voting a safe option; if anything, they demonstrate just how risky it is.

Government should consider alternatives to online voting

The Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy, published on January 26, makes recommendations to Parliament on digital policy over the next five years, some more radical than others. A particularly difficult recommendation is the call for universal online voting by 2020.

Preventing fraud is a tall order. Estonia is the only country that uses online voting for national elections, and has done so since 2005. Although there have been no major scandals, in 2014, an independent report identified vulnerabilities in the system. In 2010, a trial of online voting in the District of Columbia in the US failed when hackers at the University of Michigan managed to rig votes en masse.

An additional challenge is preserving the secret ballot, as digitization makes it more difficult to reliably separate voters’ identities from their ballots. This problem is greatly exacerbated by what we now know of anglophone states’ digital surveillance programs. Not only do digital ballots need to be free of any explicit “mark” of voters’ identities, but steps must be taken prevent ballots from being deliberately traced back through the system to those who cast them. This is assuming that users’ identities can be verified in the first place, the practicalities of which are still being worked out in countries that eschew national identity registers as a matter of policy, such as the UK.

Strangely, the Commission acknowledges the need to address these challenges but endorses the 2020 goal without discussing how they might be addressed. This is unwise, as it assumes that secure online voting is merely a question of good practice. This might not be the case: many cryptographers are skeptical of online voting altogether. Governments interested in this area should weigh up the alternatives, such as electronic systems for polling stations, which might make counting more accurate and efficient while avoiding some of the risks inherent in online voting.


Further reading

ID Management for Public Services: Opportunities and Pitfalls, IT0007-000767 (September 2014)


Nick Wallace, Analyst, Public Sector

Recommended Articles

  • Internet of Things

    IoT Viewpoints 2018

    IoT Viewpoints explore the IoT opportunity in 2018 and beyond. Download our latest e-book to get our newest collection of thought leadership articles on the emerging IoT trends, technologies and opportunities.

    Topics IoT

  • Consumer & Entertainment Services

    US pay TV: Is it facing an existential threat?

    By Adam Thomas 28 Mar 2018

    With US pay TV having endured the worst year in its history, thoughts have inevitably turned to the future. The likelihood remains that the immediate future will remain highly uncomfortable for everyone except the scaled multinational digital platforms.

  • Enterprise Services

    5G: Another technology in search of enterprise use cases

    By Evan Kirchheimer 26 Apr 2018

    Service provider interest in justifying 5G investment through its potential to open new revenue streams from the enterprise segment is growing ever greater.


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700

Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 788 597 5160 or email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now