skip to main content
Close Icon

In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. This is done using simple text files called cookies which sit on your computer. By continuing to use this site and access its features, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more about the way Informa uses cookies please go to our Cookie Policy page.

Global Search Configuration


The ongoing debate over YouTube’s value to the recorded-music industry was reignited at the end of last year, with news that the online video service had signed new licensing deals with UMG and SME.


  • Although rights holders have long complained that YouTube pays a lot less than the audio on-demand streaming leaders, record companies have had little option but to sign licensing deals with the service, given its safe-harbor protection.

Features and Benefits

  • Evaluates the latest licensing deals between YouTube and the major record companies.
  • Looks at how future licensing deals could be affected, should there be a change in circumstances.

Key questions answered

  • Why do record companies license their content to YouTube, given the low rates paid by the online video service?
  • What circumstances could change to make YouTube more financially valuable to music companies?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • Record companies maintain close ties with YouTube
  • Practical approach to licensing
  • Change in the longer term


  • Author

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team - +44 (0) 207 017 7700

Asia-Pacific team - +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team - +1 646 957 8878

+44 (0) 207 551 9047 - Operational from 09.00 - 17.00 UK time

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Call us at +44 7770704398 or email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now