skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration


Later this year, the California Supreme Court is set to rule on whether the artists Flo & Eddie should receive royalties for the performance of their recordings by online radio service Pandora.


  • Although Flo & Eddie were unsuccessful in a similar case brought against satellite radio service SiriusXM in New York and Florida, the California case has prompted a number of amicus brief filings from interested parties that both support and are against the payment of royalties on pre-1972 recordings.

Features and Benefits

  • Details the different amicus briefs filed with the California Supreme Court in the long-running case between the artists Flo & Eddie and Pandora over whether certain royalties should be paid on pre-1972 recordings.
  • Assesses the support provided to the artists and those against any extension of copyright.

Key questions answered

  • What questions has the California Supreme Court been asked in relation to the Flo & Eddie/Pandora pre-1972 case?
  • Which side is likely to come out on top?

Table of contents

Ovum view

  • Summary
  • The long road to settling the issue of pre-1972 royalties
  • The final countdown in California
  • No case for a new common law right


  • Author

Recommended Articles


Have any questions? Speak to a Specialist

Europe, Middle East & Africa team: +44 7771 980316

Asia-Pacific team: +61 (0)3 960 16700

US team: +1 212-652-5335

Email us at

You can also contact your named/allocated Client Services Executive using their direct dial.
PR enquiries - Email us at

Contact marketing -

Already an Ovum client? Login to the Knowledge Center now